Thematic Analysis: a Critical Review Ofits Process and Evaluation

نویسنده

  • Mohammed Ibrahim
چکیده

This paper critically reviews of the use of thematic analysis (TA) in qualitative research by describingits procedures and processes andby comparing grounded theory (GTA) with hermeneutic analysis.The literature that relates to thematic analysis (TA) shows that there is a lackof descriptions issues exist due respect to the concepts, process, validations and clarifications that been used by researchers. This paper finds that thematic analysis is a comprehensive process where researchers are able to identify numerous cross-references betweenthe data the research‟s evolving themes(Hayes 1997). It provides flexibility for approaching research patterns in two ways, i.e. inductive and deductive (Frith and Gleeson 2004; Hayes 1997; Niece 2011; Halldorson 2009). This makes the process of thematic analysis more appropriate for analyzing the data when the research‟s aim is to extract information to determine the relationship between variables and to compare different sets of evidencethat pertain to different situations in same study.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Critical Thinking

Introduction: One of the main goals of education is thinking development. Thinking about thinking for improving the thinking process is the heart of critical thinking. This paper aimed to provide different definitions of critical thinking. Methods: This review was conducted on some published articles during 1990 to 2007 in the field of critical thinking Results: Various experts have used dif...

متن کامل

Evaluation of Human Reliability by Standardized Plant Analysis Risk HRA (SPAR-H) method in the Dialysis Process in Ebne Sina Hospital, Shiraz

Background and Objectives: Human errors in dialysis care can cause injury and death. One of the basic steps to increase reliability in this critical process is to analyze the error and identify the weaknesses of doing this process. Methods: The present study is a descriptive-analytic cross-sectional study. The SPAR-H method was used to identify and evaluate the probability of human error in th...

متن کامل

Developing a Critical Checklist for Textbook Evaluation

This study has been carried out to develop a critical checklist for global/commercial textbooks which play a crucial role in language teaching/learning. For this aim, a number of items have been developed based on a comprehensive review of the related literature and experts’ opinions. The tentative checklist was administered to the targeted population, yet 326 checklists were deemed appropriate...

متن کامل

مقایسه فرصتهای دگرسنجی و تحلیل استنادی در ارزیابی پژوهش

The present study atempts to explain the strengths of altmetrics and compare them with those of citation-based indicators, and thereby reveal opportunities provided by social web in research evaluation.Applying a qualitative thematic analysis method, it studied the contents of research and theoretical works about the citation and altmetrics indicators in order to extract their authors’ views ab...

متن کامل

قضاوت بالینی در پرستاری: تحلیل مفهوم به روش رویکرد تکاملی راجرز

  Background & Aim: Nurses’ clinical judgment is an evolving complex concept. In order to understand the concept, clarification is needed. This study aimed to conduct the concept analysis of clinical judgment in nursing .   Methods & Materials: Based on the Rodgers’s evolutionary method, evolving concept of clinical judgment in nursing was analyzed. Literature was retrieved from scientific d...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012